Filed under agit-prop

Making climate change personal

GetUp’s latest campaign is calling on the federal government to take action on climate change. As big issues go, this is the big one, so I’m sure many of my Australian readers will want to sign the petition, which reads “I want my government to take sweeping action to dramatically cut greenhouse pollution, shift to clean energy and solve the climate crisis now.”

It’s hard to disagree with that.

For this campaign, GetUp is recording your postcode and using that to plot responses on a map of Australia – here’s what it looked like after I signed on this morning:

Getup Climatechangemap

The real thing is Flash-based, but nicely understated with the dots appearing like raindrops (we could do with some of that; I dreamt about rain last night).

Of course, it’s unlikely our present government is going to get the message strongly enough to change their current course, which is essentially to do whatever the coal lobby asks, and to divert public attention with a distracting and pointless debate about nuclear energy.

I’d like to see the ALP come out with a strong statement on climate change. It’s clear that an increasing proportion of Aussies see this as “the” big issue, and there’s an opportunity for the Labor Party to differentiate themselves from the coalition on this. Beazley should promise to sign the Kyoto Protocol within 10 days of becoming PM, and undertake to invest substantial cash and energy into renewable energy, a carbon trading scheme and a national water plan. He could be “the climate change Prime Minister”.

Will he? Probably not — the ALP is beholden to the coal industry too, and risk-averse when it comes to big issues which might negatively affect some hot-button workers’ groups (think of what the timber-getters did to Latham last time after he promised an end to old-growth logging in Tasmania).

Still, you can hope and dream and sign the petition — it only takes a minute.

Movember

My fellow antipodean blogger Gazza (.net.nz) is growing a moustache to raise money for prostate cancer. I’m not too sure what Gareth looks like sans facial topiary, but he assures me he’s going to look “absolutely ridiculous” with a mo.

Mostyle

I’ve already chipped in 50 Kiwi dollars (approx AUD $3.25) to encourage him along. It’s for a good cause, so I heartily encourage you to do the same.

(Image from decaffeinated.org, who may have got it from somewhere else; in any case the likeness of Jihad Jack is rather poor.)

Abuse of Power

Abuseofpower

Click image to see a short video sending up those annoying, not-skippable-past anti-piracy propaganda blurbs that get inserted on just about every DVD these days.

(Via Boing Boing)

Vote

Both The Age and NineMSN are running reader polls on the gay marriage issue. Get out the vote:

If you’re still in the votin‘ mood after that, you could follow up with Is the government alienating workers with its new industrial relations laws? on Yahoo!7.

Fund our ABC

Abc-SmallmegaphoneWe are at a turning point in the future of a fundamental and cherished Australian institution, the ABC. Right now, the Cabinet’s budget committee is deciding the ABC’s funding for the next three years. Their next meeting is on Tuesday.

As it stands, the ABC is $264 million poorer in real terms today than it was 20 years ago. The programs we rely on – from independent news and current and affairs to quality children’s content – are under extreme pressure. In a very real sense, the integrity of the ABC is now at stake.

Sign the petition at GetUp.org.au.

No flying trams here

Van Lance Flyer

Tonight at the Australian Museum in Sydney, yours truly, his husband, and a panel of experts, discussing sex, HIV, love, pleasure and “other catastrophes”. Should be fun, more relevant and way lower budget than the other major spectacle taking place at the same time.

Come say hi.

RU 4 Choice?

In Australia, we have an independent, scientifically-qualified, organisation called the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) which is responsible for deciding whether medicines are safe and appropriate for use in Australia. Before any drug can be sold (whether over the counter or on prescription) it must first pass the TGA’s careful and stringent review process.

There is one exception to this eminently sensible, open and transparent process: a drug called mifepristone, better known as RU-486. It is approved for use in 35 countries, including the UK, many European countries, the United States and New Zealand, and has been used by 21 million women and has an excellent safety record.

Mifepristone is a “controversial” drug because it is used to terminate pregnancies. It works by blocking the action of a hormone which is required for the pregnancy to continue.

In Australia, RU-486 is not licensed and the TGA is not even allowed to consider licensing it. Because of a political deal done years ago to secure the support of conservative Catholic Senator Brian Harradine, the law says only the federal health minister (who is neither a doctor, a medical scientist nor a woman) can approve the use of this drug.

RU4choice logo

There is a Bill before the Parliament now which could erase this absurd arrangement and return the power to license (or refuse to license) RU-486 to the TGA. Sexual Health and Family Planning Australia have launched an online petition calling on the Parliament to pass the Bill. If you think the TGA, not the health minister, should decide which drugs are safe for Australians to use, sign the petition.

Bare-backing and nail-biting

barebackingforumflyer.jpg

Not sure if I’m there for the barebacking or the nail biting, but yours truly will be one of the panelists for this Midsumma Festival event next Sunday afternoon. Brent’s on the panel too. Promises to be excruciatingly entertaining. It’s free. Do come. Email Suzy to book your seat.

Cynical politics that weakens society

The editorial in today’s Melbourne Age takes a very reasonable line on the gay marriage debate:

Certainly the ban will fan intolerance, and that is a most potent reason for not proceeding with it. If the Parliament must vote on the issue (and there appears to be no pressing reason for the legislation) it would best be decided by conscience vote rather than by party directive.

It appears Labor may have agreed to the ban in order to neutralise it as an issue before the election. If so, this is cynical politics that weakens the society our parliamentarians are meant to serve.

Meanwhile, the Shadow A-G, Nicola Roxon, has sent me a long rambling form reply to an email I sent her last week on the subject. It’s not particularly illuminating, except in so far as it betrays Labor’s (or at least the right wing’s) true motivation:
Continue reading