From the ABC News website today:
- Anti-terrorism laws lack UK-style safeguards: expert (6:44am)
- Beattie warns terrorism laws ‘unconstitutional’ (8:12am)
- PM denies terrorism laws unconstitutional (10:43am)
(Coming soon: PM suspends constitution; cites pressing need to combat terrorism)
I should also mention the speech by J.M. Coetzee, the South African author who won the 2003 Novel Prize for literature, the other day. Speaking at a reading of his new book, Waiting for the Barbarians, in Sydney:
Coetzee said the South African police “could do what they wanted because there was no real recourse against them because special provisions of the legislation indemnified them in advance”.
He went on to tell the packed auditorium: “If somebody telephoned a reporter and said, ‘Tell the world — some men came last night, took my husband, my son, my father away, I don’t know who they were, they didn’t give names, they had guns’, the next thing that happened would be that you and the reporter in question would be brought into custody for furthering the aims of the proscribed organisation endangering the security of the state.”
The 2003 Nobel laureate ended his introduction with: “All of this, and much more during apartheid in South Africa, was done in the name of the fight against terror.”
While Coetzee did not specifically refer to the Howard Government, there was no question his pointed speech was directed at anti-terror laws due to be introduced into federal and state parliaments next month. [The Australian]




Another day, another round of news bulletins chock-full of pictures of Peter Costello sulking because John Howard won’t let him have a turn with the bat. The short man, showing no sign of being ready to let anyone else but himself screw this country back into the 1950s, made a few unguarded comments over the weekend which have Costello crying foul.
